Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

getjerry customize branch #1

Open
wants to merge 43 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bellondr
Copy link
Collaborator

@bellondr bellondr commented Dec 13, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new script for service readiness checks, enhancing monitoring capabilities.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved ingress service processing logic to handle annotations more effectively.
  • Configuration Changes

    • Updated server configuration to implement a reverse proxy setup for better request handling.
    • Removed default server denial logic while maintaining strict SNI handling.
    • Simplified HTTP to HTTPS redirection logic in the UI configuration.
    • Added new directives to optimize server names hash table sizes in the HTTP configuration.
    • Added a new location block for Nginx status checks to monitor server health.
  • Docker

    • Enhanced Dockerfile to include additional Python dependencies for improved functionality.
  • Data Model Updates

    • Increased the maximum length of identifier fields in several database models to accommodate a broader range of values.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 13, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications across several components of the system, focusing on ingress controller logic, configuration management, server configurations, and build processes. Key changes include enhancing service processing in the IngressController, adding logging in the Config class, updating Nginx configuration files to use reverse proxy settings, modifying the Dockerfile to include additional Python requirements, and introducing a new readiness script to validate service health.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/autoconf/IngressController.py - Enhanced service processing logic
- Added early return for services without "bunkerweb.io" annotations
- Simplified ingress rule parsing
src/autoconf/Config.py - Added logging statements in wait_applying method
- No changes to core functionality
src/common/core/misc/confs/default-server-http/disable.conf - Removed default server denial logic
- Retained strict SNI handling
src/common/core/misc/confs/default-server-http/page.conf - Entire file deleted
src/common/confs/default-server-http.conf - Replaced static content location with reverse proxy configuration
- Added proxy settings to upstream server
src/bw/Dockerfile - Added new requirements file installation
- Expanded source file copying
src/common/helpers/readiness.sh - New script added for service readiness checks
src/common/core/ui/confs/default-server-http/ui.conf - Removed HTTP to HTTPS redirection logic
src/common/db/model.py - Increased id field lengths in multiple classes from String(64) to String(256)
src/common/confs/http.conf - Added server_names_hash_bucket_size and server_names_hash_max_size directives
src/common/confs/healthcheck.conf - Added new location block for /nginx_status with stub_status directive
src/common/confs/server-http/server.conf - Updated include statements to specific paths for Lua configuration files
src/common/confs/server-stream/server-stream.conf - Added conditional listening directives for HTTP and IPv6

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant IC as IngressController
    participant Config as Config Service
    participant Nginx as Nginx Server
    participant Readiness as Readiness Script

    IC->>IC: Process Services
    IC-->>Config: Check Configuration
    Nginx->>Nginx: Apply Proxy Settings
    Readiness->>Nginx: Check Service Health
    Readiness-->>Nginx: Validate PID
    Readiness-->>Nginx: Check Healthz Endpoint
Loading

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, through configs we dance,
Reverse proxies now take their stance,
Readiness checks with rabbit-like grace,
Ingress controllers set a new pace,
Code evolves with each gentle prance! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d7cb5ed and 66afafa.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/common/confs/server-stream/server-stream.conf (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/common/confs/server-stream/server-stream.conf

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9c602de and 8bde676.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • src/autoconf/IngressController.py (2 hunks)
  • src/common/core/reverseproxy/confs/server-http/reverse-proxy.conf (1 hunks)
  • src/common/core/ui/confs/default-server-http/ui.conf (0 hunks)
  • src/common/db/model.py (4 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/common/core/ui/confs/default-server-http/ui.conf
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
src/autoconf/IngressController.py (1)

Pattern **/*: Be concise and precise. Skip minor issues and focus on critical problems and potentially wrong code. Avoid raising multiple comments with similar or repetitive content and instead use one comment in the selected key place to clearly state common concerns.

src/common/core/reverseproxy/confs/server-http/reverse-proxy.conf (1)

Pattern **/*: Be concise and precise. Skip minor issues and focus on critical problems and potentially wrong code. Avoid raising multiple comments with similar or repetitive content and instead use one comment in the selected key place to clearly state common concerns.

src/common/db/model.py (1)

Pattern **/*: Be concise and precise. Skip minor issues and focus on critical problems and potentially wrong code. Avoid raising multiple comments with similar or repetitive content and instead use one comment in the selected key place to clearly state common concerns.

🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/autoconf/IngressController.py (2)

215-215: ⚠️ Potential issue

Ensure consistent annotation requirements across the codebase.

The change to require "bunkerweb.io" annotation for Ingress events aligns with the filtering in _to_services but represents a breaking change in event processing behavior.

✅ Verification successful

Let me try a different approach to verify the Ingress processing requirements.


The "bunkerweb.io" annotation requirement is consistently applied across the codebase

The verification shows that the requirement for "bunkerweb.io" annotations is consistently implemented throughout the codebase:

  • All Kubernetes resources (Pods, ConfigMaps, Ingress) are filtered based on "bunkerweb.io" related annotations
  • The change aligns with the existing annotation-based filtering pattern used for other resource types
  • The modification represents an intentional design choice for resource filtering rather than a breaking change
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for other places that might assume different Ingress processing
ast-grep --pattern 'if obj.kind == "Ingress" {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 999


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for Ingress-related processing patterns in Python files
rg -t py "obj.*kind.*Ingress|annotations.*bunkerweb" -A 3 -B 3

# Also check for any Ingress-related configuration or constants
rg -t py "INGRESS|ingress" --ignore-case

Length of output: 7408


69-70: Verify the impact on existing services.

The early return condition improves filtering efficiency but could potentially skip processing of existing services that don't have the "bunkerweb.io" annotation.

✅ Verification successful

Early return condition is by design and safe to use

The early return condition checking for bunkerweb.io annotation is correct and intentional. The code shows that:

  1. The bunkerweb.io annotation is a core requirement for BunkerWeb's ingress controller functionality, used consistently throughout the codebase
  2. All example ingresses in the repository are templates/examples, not production resources
  3. The annotation is used to identify which ingress resources should be processed by BunkerWeb

The early return optimization is safe and consistent with the codebase's design.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for existing ingresses that might be affected
rg -A 5 "kind:\s+Ingress" | grep -v "bunkerweb.io"

Length of output: 4881


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if these are just example files or if there are actual ingress resources in src/
fd "\.ya?ml$" src/ --exec rg -l "kind:\s+Ingress" {}

# Also check the implementation to understand if this is a breaking change
ast-grep --pattern 'def _to_services($$$)'

Length of output: 862


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to check the implementation
rg -A 10 "def _to_services" src/

# Also check if there are any production ingress manifests
find src/ -type f -name "*.yml" -o -name "*.yaml" | xargs cat

Length of output: 69408


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if the bunkerweb.io annotation is required by design
rg -A 5 "bunkerweb.io" src/

# Also check if there are any production ingress resources
find src/ -type f -name "*.yml" -o -name "*.yaml" | xargs rg "kind:\s+Ingress"

Length of output: 41544

src/common/db/model.py (1)

118-118: Verify database migration strategy.

Increasing the column length from 64 to 255 requires a database migration strategy to handle existing data.

@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ add_header X-Proxy-Cache $upstream_cache_status;
{% set includes = all[k.replace("HOST", "INCLUDES")] if k.replace("HOST", "INCLUDES") in all else "" %}
location {{ url }} {% raw %}{{% endraw +%}
etag off;
set $backend{{ counter.value }} "{{ host }}";
set $backend{{ counter.value }} "http://ingress-nginx-controller.kube-system.svc.cluster.local:80";;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix syntax error and reconsider static backend configuration.

The line contains two issues:

  1. Double semicolon at the end of the line
  2. Hardcoded backend URL may not work across different Kubernetes environments

Apply this fix:

-	set $backend{{ counter.value }} "http://ingress-nginx-controller.kube-system.svc.cluster.local:80";;
+	set $backend{{ counter.value }} "http://ingress-nginx-controller.kube-system.svc.cluster.local:80";

Consider making the backend URL configurable through environment variables or annotations to support different Kubernetes setups.

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

@bellondr bellondr force-pushed the bellon/getjerry_customize_branch branch from 43bd780 to 8bde676 Compare December 14, 2024 08:04
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/autoconf/Config.py (1)

Line range hint 84-103: Consider making timeout configuration more flexible

The method uses hardcoded values for retry count (60) and sleep interval (5 seconds), resulting in a fixed 5-minute maximum wait time. This might not be suitable for all environments or configuration sizes.

Consider:

  1. Making these values configurable through environment variables:
    MAX_RETRIES = int(getenv('CONFIG_MAX_RETRIES', '60'))
    RETRY_INTERVAL = int(getenv('CONFIG_RETRY_INTERVAL', '5'))
  2. Adding exponential backoff for retries
  3. Adding metrics/monitoring for wait times to help tune these values

Would you like me to propose a detailed implementation for these improvements?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8bde676 and 324f0b6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/autoconf/Config.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/autoconf/Config.py (1)

Pattern **/*: Be concise and precise. Skip minor issues and focus on critical problems and potentially wrong code. Avoid raising multiple comments with similar or repetitive content and instead use one comment in the selected key place to clearly state common concerns.

Comment on lines +85 to +87
self.__logger.info(f"current changed: {curr_changes}")
first_config_saved = self._db.is_first_config_saved()
self.__logger.info(f"first config saved: {first_config_saved}")
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider adjusting logging approach for better production readiness

While adding visibility is good, the current logging implementation could be improved:

  1. Consider using DEBUG level instead of INFO for detailed state logging to prevent log spam in production.
  2. Add sanitization/truncation of potentially sensitive or large data structures before logging.
  3. Move logging statements after their respective error checks to avoid logging invalid states.

Apply this diff to improve the logging implementation:

-            self.__logger.info(f"current changed: {curr_changes}")
             first_config_saved = self._db.is_first_config_saved()
-            self.__logger.info(f"first config saved: {first_config_saved}")
             if isinstance(curr_changes, str):
                 if not startup:
                     self.__logger.error(f"An error occurred when checking for changes in the database : {curr_changes}")
+            else:
+                self.__logger.debug(f"Current changes status: {str(curr_changes)[:200]}...")
             elif isinstance(first_config_saved, str):
                 if not startup:
                     self.__logger.error(f"An error occurred when checking if the first config is saved in the database : {first_config_saved}")
+            else:
+                self.__logger.debug(f"First config saved: {first_config_saved}")
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
self.__logger.info(f"current changed: {curr_changes}")
first_config_saved = self._db.is_first_config_saved()
self.__logger.info(f"first config saved: {first_config_saved}")
first_config_saved = self._db.is_first_config_saved()
if isinstance(curr_changes, str):
if not startup:
self.__logger.error(f"An error occurred when checking for changes in the database : {curr_changes}")
else:
self.__logger.debug(f"Current changes status: {str(curr_changes)[:200]}...")
elif isinstance(first_config_saved, str):
if not startup:
self.__logger.error(f"An error occurred when checking if the first config is saved in the database : {first_config_saved}")
else:
self.__logger.debug(f"First config saved: {first_config_saved}")

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/autoconf/Config.py (1)

Line range hint 83-103: Consider architectural improvements to the waiting mechanism.

The current implementation has several areas that could be enhanced:

  1. The 5-minute timeout is hardcoded (60 retries * 5 seconds). Consider making this configurable through environment variables.
  2. The error handling differentiates between startup and non-startup scenarios, which could be simplified.
  3. The method could benefit from structured logging for better monitoring.

Consider implementing these improvements in a follow-up PR:

  1. Add environment variables for timeout configuration:
MAX_RETRIES = int(getenv('CONFIG_MAX_RETRIES', '60'))
RETRY_DELAY = int(getenv('CONFIG_RETRY_DELAY', '5'))
  1. Use structured logging for better monitoring:
self.__logger.debug('Waiting for configuration application', extra={
    'current_changes': list(curr_changes.keys()) if isinstance(curr_changes, dict) else None,
    'first_config_saved': first_config_saved,
    'attempt': i,
    'max_retries': MAX_RETRIES,
    'startup_mode': startup
})

Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track these improvements?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8bde676 and 324f0b6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/autoconf/Config.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/autoconf/Config.py (1)

Pattern **/*: Be concise and precise. Skip minor issues and focus on critical problems and potentially wrong code. Avoid raising multiple comments with similar or repetitive content and instead use one comment in the selected key place to clearly state common concerns.

Comment on lines +85 to +87
self.__logger.info(f"current changed: {curr_changes}")
first_config_saved = self._db.is_first_config_saved()
self.__logger.info(f"first config saved: {first_config_saved}")
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve logging implementation for better security and clarity.

While adding logging for debugging is valuable, the current implementation could be enhanced:

  1. Consider using DEBUG level instead of INFO for internal state logging
  2. Avoid logging raw configuration objects that might contain sensitive data
  3. Fix the grammatical error in the log message

Apply this diff to improve the logging implementation:

-            self.__logger.info(f"current changed: {curr_changes}")
+            self.__logger.debug(f"Current changes detected: {list(curr_changes.keys()) if isinstance(curr_changes, dict) else 'error'}")
-            self.__logger.info(f"first config saved: {first_config_saved}")
+            self.__logger.debug(f"First configuration saved status: {first_config_saved}")

This change:

  • Uses DEBUG level for internal state logging
  • Only logs the keys of changes instead of the entire object
  • Improves message clarity and grammar
  • Handles the case when curr_changes is a string (error message)
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
self.__logger.info(f"current changed: {curr_changes}")
first_config_saved = self._db.is_first_config_saved()
self.__logger.info(f"first config saved: {first_config_saved}")
self.__logger.debug(f"Current changes detected: {list(curr_changes.keys()) if isinstance(curr_changes, dict) else 'error'}")
first_config_saved = self._db.is_first_config_saved()
self.__logger.debug(f"First configuration saved status: {first_config_saved}")

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/common/confs/default-server-http.conf (1)

53-53: Consider parameterizing the backend URL and reviewing timeout values

  1. The hardcoded backend URL http://ingress-nginx-controller.kube-system.svc.cluster.local:80 creates tight coupling with Kubernetes infrastructure. Consider making it configurable through environment variables.
  2. The timeout values (600s = 10 minutes) are quite high:
    • proxy_read_timeout 600s
    • proxy_send_timeout 600s

These long timeouts could potentially lead to resource exhaustion under heavy load.

Consider this configuration pattern:

proxy_pass "${BACKEND_URL}";
proxy_read_timeout ${READ_TIMEOUT_SECONDS}s;
proxy_send_timeout ${SEND_TIMEOUT_SECONDS}s;

Also applies to: 66-68

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ff74a64 and 43749bb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/common/confs/default-server-http.conf (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/common/confs/default-server-http.conf (1)

Pattern **/*: Be concise and precise. Skip minor issues and focus on critical problems and potentially wrong code. Avoid raising multiple comments with similar or repetitive content and instead use one comment in the selected key place to clearly state common concerns.

🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/common/confs/default-server-http.conf (1)

50-50: Verify location block precedence with loading state

The new location block might conflict with the existing loading state block (IS_LOADING == "yes"). Please verify:

  1. The order of precedence between these blocks
  2. That the loading state functionality remains intact

Also applies to: 70-70

Comment on lines 54 to 59
proxy_set_header Host $host;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Protocol $scheme;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Host $http_host;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance security headers and SSL/TLS configuration

While the basic proxy headers are set correctly, consider adding these security-related configurations:

# Security headers
proxy_set_header X-Frame-Options "SAMEORIGIN";
proxy_set_header X-Content-Type-Options "nosniff";

# Ensure SSL/TLS is properly handled
proxy_ssl_server_name on;
proxy_ssl_protocols TLSv1.2 TLSv1.3;

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
src/common/confs/default-server-http.conf (1)

195-201: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance proxy configuration with security headers and make backend URL configurable

The proxy configuration should be enhanced for better security and maintainability:

  1. The backend URL should be configurable via an environment variable
  2. Security headers are missing

Apply this diff:

-       proxy_pass "http://ingress-nginx-controller.kube-system.svc.cluster.local:80";
+       set $backend_url "http://ingress-nginx-controller.kube-system.svc.cluster.local:80";
+       proxy_pass $backend_url;
+       
+       # Security headers
+       proxy_set_header X-Frame-Options "SAMEORIGIN";
+       proxy_set_header X-Content-Type-Options "nosniff";
+       proxy_set_header X-XSS-Protection "1; mode=block";
+       proxy_set_header Strict-Transport-Security "max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains" always;
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/common/confs/default-server-http.conf (1)

203-205: Review proxy timeout values

The current timeout settings are quite high:

  • read_timeout and send_timeout of 600s (10 minutes) could lead to resource exhaustion
  • Long-running connections might impact server performance

Consider using more conservative values unless specifically required by your backend service:

-       proxy_connect_timeout 60s;
-       proxy_read_timeout 600s;
-       proxy_send_timeout 600s;
+       proxy_connect_timeout 30s;
+       proxy_read_timeout 60s;
+       proxy_send_timeout 60s;
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e60a25e and f7ff383.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/common/confs/default-server-http.conf (1 hunks)
  • src/common/core/misc/confs/default-server-http/disable.conf (0 hunks)
  • src/common/core/misc/confs/default-server-http/page.conf (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
  • src/common/core/misc/confs/default-server-http/disable.conf
  • src/common/core/misc/confs/default-server-http/page.conf
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/common/confs/default-server-http.conf (1)

Pattern **/*: Be concise and precise. Skip minor issues and focus on critical problems and potentially wrong code. Avoid raising multiple comments with similar or repetitive content and instead use one comment in the selected key place to clearly state common concerns.

🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/common/confs/default-server-http.conf (1)

193-206: Verify location block precedence with IS_LOADING condition

The new location block might conflict with the existing IS_LOADING block since both handle the root location (/). Please verify:

  1. The intended behavior when IS_LOADING is "yes"
  2. The order of location block evaluation
✅ Verification successful

No conflict between location blocks - conditional execution is properly handled

The verification shows that the location blocks are properly structured with conditional execution:

  1. The IS_LOADING location block is wrapped in {% if IS_LOADING == "yes" +%} condition
  2. The new proxy location block appears after the IS_LOADING block
  3. The conditions are mutually exclusive - when IS_LOADING is "yes", only the loading page is served; otherwise, the proxy configuration is active
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential location block conflicts
# Search for other location blocks in the codebase that might affect the root path

# Look for location blocks in nginx configs
echo "Searching for location blocks in nginx configs..."
rg -A 5 "location\s+/" --type nginx

# Look for IS_LOADING usage
echo "Checking IS_LOADING usage..."
rg "IS_LOADING" --type nginx

Length of output: 302


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for location blocks and IS_LOADING without file type restriction
echo "Searching for location blocks in nginx-like configs..."
rg -A 5 "location\s+/" "*.conf"

echo -e "\nChecking IS_LOADING usage..."
rg "IS_LOADING" "*.conf"

Length of output: 344


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# First, find all conf files in the repository
echo "Finding all .conf files..."
fd -e conf

echo -e "\nSearching for location blocks in nginx-like configs..."
fd -e conf --exec rg -A 5 "location\s+/" {}

echo -e "\nChecking IS_LOADING usage..."
fd -e conf --exec rg "IS_LOADING" {}

Length of output: 20461


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's specifically check the default-server-http.conf file for location blocks and their order
echo "Checking location blocks in default-server-http.conf..."
rg -B 5 -A 10 "location\s+/" src/common/confs/default-server-http.conf

echo -e "\nChecking IS_LOADING condition block..."
rg -B 5 -A 10 "IS_LOADING.*yes" src/common/confs/default-server-http.conf

Length of output: 1654

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
src/common/confs/default-server-http.conf (1)

193-211: ⚠️ Potential issue

Enhance security headers and error handling

The proxy configuration is missing essential security headers and error handling.

Add the following configurations:

 location / {
     etag off;
     proxy_pass "http://ingress-nginx-controller.kube-system.svc.cluster.local:80";
     proxy_set_header Host $host;
     proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
     proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr;
     proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme;
     proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Protocol $scheme;
     proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Host $http_host;
     proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Prefix "/";
     proxy_buffering on;
     proxy_connect_timeout 60s;
     proxy_read_timeout 600s;
     proxy_send_timeout 600s;
+    # Security headers
+    proxy_set_header X-Frame-Options "SAMEORIGIN";
+    proxy_set_header X-Content-Type-Options "nosniff";
+    
+    # Error handling
+    proxy_intercept_errors on;
+    error_page 500 502 503 504 /50x.html;
+    
+    # SSL/TLS handling
+    proxy_ssl_server_name on;
+    proxy_ssl_protocols TLSv1.2 TLSv1.3;
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 42a3469 and aaee599.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • src/common/confs/default-server-http.conf (1 hunks)
  • src/common/core/misc/confs/default-server-http/disable.conf (0 hunks)
  • src/common/core/misc/confs/default-server-http/page.conf (0 hunks)
  • src/common/core/reverseproxy/confs/server-http/reverse-proxy.conf (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
  • src/common/core/misc/confs/default-server-http/disable.conf
  • src/common/core/misc/confs/default-server-http/page.conf
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/common/core/reverseproxy/confs/server-http/reverse-proxy.conf
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/common/confs/default-server-http.conf (1)

Pattern **/*: Be concise and precise. Skip minor issues and focus on critical problems and potentially wrong code. Avoid raising multiple comments with similar or repetitive content and instead use one comment in the selected key place to clearly state common concerns.

🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/common/confs/default-server-http.conf (2)

207-209: Review timeout values

The read and send timeouts are set to 600 seconds (10 minutes), which seems excessive and could lead to resource exhaustion.

Consider reducing the timeouts unless there's a specific requirement:

-		proxy_read_timeout 600s;
-		proxy_send_timeout 600s;
+		proxy_read_timeout 60s;
+		proxy_send_timeout 60s;

193-211: Verify configuration conflicts

The new location block might conflict with configurations included from /etc/nginx/default-server-http/*.conf or /etc/bunkerweb/configs/default-server-http/*.conf.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can now make a definitive assessment. The file src/common/confs/default-server-http.conf shows two location / blocks:

  1. A default loading page block
  2. The new proxy block under review

The search also revealed that any additional location blocks would come from:

  • /etc/nginx/default-server-http/*.conf
  • /etc/bunkerweb/configs/default-server-http/*.conf

However, these are runtime configuration directories that are populated during deployment, not source code directories in the repository. The actual source code shows no conflicting location blocks in the repository.

No configuration conflicts found

The new location block in default-server-http.conf is the only root location block (location /) in the source code, and it properly replaces the default loading page block. The include directives for additional configurations are at a different scope level and won't create conflicts with this location block.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for conflicting location blocks in included configurations
echo "Checking for conflicting location blocks in default-server-http..."
fd . "/etc/nginx/default-server-http/" "/etc/bunkerweb/configs/default-server-http/" -t f -e conf -x rg -l "location\s+/"

# Check for any proxy_pass directives that might conflict
echo "Checking for proxy_pass directives..."
fd . "/etc/nginx/default-server-http/" "/etc/bunkerweb/configs/default-server-http/" -t f -e conf -x rg "proxy_pass"

Length of output: 878


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual repository structure first
echo "Repository structure:"
fd -t f -e conf

# Then search for any location blocks and proxy_pass directives in conf files
echo -e "\nChecking for location blocks and proxy_pass directives:"
rg -A 5 "location\s+/" --type-add 'conf:*.conf' -t conf

# Check for include directives to understand configuration structure
echo -e "\nChecking for include directives:"
rg "^\s*include" --type-add 'conf:*.conf' -t conf

Length of output: 33176

@@ -190,4 +190,23 @@ server {

}

location / {
etag off;
proxy_pass "http://ingress-nginx-controller.kube-system.svc.cluster.local:80";
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider parameterizing the backend URL

The backend URL is hardcoded, which reduces flexibility and makes the configuration environment-specific. Consider using a variable:

-		proxy_pass "http://ingress-nginx-controller.kube-system.svc.cluster.local:80";
+		proxy_pass $backend_url;

Add at the top of the server block:

set $backend_url "http://ingress-nginx-controller.kube-system.svc.cluster.local:80";

Comment on lines 193 to 211
location / {
etag off;
proxy_pass "http://ingress-nginx-controller.kube-system.svc.cluster.local:80";
proxy_set_header Host $host;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Protocol $scheme;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Host $http_host;

proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Prefix "/";

proxy_buffering on;

proxy_connect_timeout 60s;
proxy_read_timeout 600s;
proxy_send_timeout 600s;

}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Restore critical security headers

The removal of the loading page has also removed important security headers. These headers should be restored in the new configuration.

Add the following headers either in this location block or at the server level:

# Security headers
add_header Content-Security-Policy "default-src 'none'; script-src http: https: 'unsafe-inline' 'strict-dynamic'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; frame-ancestors 'none'; base-uri 'none'; img-src 'self' data:; font-src 'self' data:; require-trusted-types-for 'script'; block-all-mixed-content; upgrade-insecure-requests;" always;
add_header Strict-Transport-Security "max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload" always;
add_header X-Content-Type-Options "nosniff" always;
add_header Referrer-Policy "no-referrer" always;

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
src/common/confs/default-server-http.conf (2)

195-195: ⚠️ Potential issue

Parameterize the backend URL for environment flexibility

The hardcoded staging URL https://api-stage.ing.getjerry.com should be externalized to allow for different environments.

-		proxy_pass "https://api-stage.ing.getjerry.com";
+		proxy_pass $backend_url;

Add at the top of the server block:

set $backend_url "https://api-stage.ing.getjerry.com";

193-211: ⚠️ Potential issue

Restore critical security headers in the proxy configuration

The new proxy configuration is missing important security headers that were present in the previous configuration.

Add these headers to the location block:

# Security headers
add_header Content-Security-Policy "default-src 'none'; script-src http: https: 'unsafe-inline' 'strict-dynamic'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; frame-ancestors 'none'; base-uri 'none'; img-src 'self' data:; font-src 'self' data:; require-trusted-types-for 'script'; block-all-mixed-content; upgrade-insecure-requests;" always;
add_header Strict-Transport-Security "max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload" always;
add_header X-Content-Type-Options "nosniff" always;
add_header Referrer-Policy "no-referrer" always;
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 34ba83f and 331f64d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/common/confs/default-server-http.conf (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/common/confs/default-server-http.conf (1)

Pattern **/*: Be concise and precise. Skip minor issues and focus on critical problems and potentially wrong code. Avoid raising multiple comments with similar or repetitive content and instead use one comment in the selected key place to clearly state common concerns.

Comment on lines 196 to 203
proxy_set_header Host $host;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Protocol $scheme;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Host $http_host;

proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Prefix "/";
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance proxy headers security configuration

While the proxy headers are generally correct, consider adding set_real_ip_from directives to explicitly trust only specific proxy IPs. This helps prevent IP spoofing through the X-Forwarded-For header.

Add these configurations:

# Define trusted proxy IPs
set_real_ip_from 10.0.0.0/8;  # Adjust based on your infrastructure
set_real_ip_from 172.16.0.0/12;
set_real_ip_from 192.168.0.0/16;
real_ip_header X-Real-IP;
real_ip_recursive on;

Comment on lines 207 to 209
proxy_connect_timeout 60s;
proxy_read_timeout 600s;
proxy_send_timeout 600s;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Review proxy timeout values

The current timeout values are unusually high:

  • proxy_read_timeout and proxy_send_timeout are set to 600 seconds (10 minutes)
  • These long timeouts could:
    • Tie up server resources
    • Make the server vulnerable to slow HTTP attacks
    • Impact server availability

Consider reducing these values unless there's a specific requirement for such long timeouts.

Suggested values:

 proxy_connect_timeout 60s;
-proxy_read_timeout 600s;
-proxy_send_timeout 600s;
+proxy_read_timeout 60s;
+proxy_send_timeout 60s;
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
proxy_connect_timeout 60s;
proxy_read_timeout 600s;
proxy_send_timeout 600s;
proxy_connect_timeout 60s;
proxy_read_timeout 60s;
proxy_send_timeout 60s;

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fe01adb and c469855.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/bw/entrypoint.sh (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/bw/entrypoint.sh (1)

Pattern **/*: Be concise and precise. Skip minor issues and focus on critical problems and potentially wrong code. Avoid raising multiple comments with similar or repetitive content and instead use one comment in the selected key place to clearly state common concerns.

@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ trap "trap_reload" HUP

# generate "temp" config
echo -e "IS_LOADING=yes\nUSE_BUNKERNET=no\nSEND_ANONYMOUS_REPORT=no\nSERVER_NAME=\nMODSECURITY_CRS_VERSION=${MODSECURITY_CRS_VERSION:-4}\nAPI_HTTP_PORT=${API_HTTP_PORT:-5000}\nAPI_SERVER_NAME=${API_SERVER_NAME:-bwapi}\nAPI_WHITELIST_IP=${API_WHITELIST_IP:-127.0.0.0/8}\nUSE_REAL_IP=${USE_REAL_IP:-no}\nUSE_PROXY_PROTOCOL=${USE_PROXY_PROTOCOL:-no}\nREAL_IP_FROM=${REAL_IP_FROM:-192.168.0.0/16 172.16.0.0/12 10.0.0.0/8}\nREAL_IP_HEADER=${REAL_IP_HEADER:-X-Forwarded-For}\nHTTP_PORT=${HTTP_PORT:-8080}\nHTTPS_PORT=${HTTPS_PORT:-8443}" > /tmp/variables.env
python3 /usr/share/bunkerweb/gen/main.py --variables /tmp/variables.env
python3 /usr/share/bunkerweb/gen/main.py /tmp/variables.env
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Python script argument handling needs to be updated

The verification reveals that the change in entrypoint.sh is incorrect. The Python script (src/common/gen/main.py) expects named arguments, specifically --variables for the environment file path. The current implementation in entrypoint.sh passes the path as a positional argument, which will cause the script to fail.

The script's argument parser shows:

parser.add_argument("--variables", type=str, help="path to the file containing environment variables")

This line should be changed back to use the --variables flag:

python3 /usr/share/bunkerweb/gen/main.py --variables /tmp/variables.env
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify Python script argument handling change

The modification changes how arguments are passed to the Python script. This could potentially break the script's functionality if it hasn't been updated to handle positional arguments instead of the --variables flag.

Let's verify the Python script's argument handling:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the Python script supports both argument styles
# and verify there are no other callers using the old style

# Check the Python script's argument parsing
rg -A 5 "ArgumentParser|parse_args" /usr/share/bunkerweb/gen/main.py

# Look for other potential callers using --variables flag
rg --type sh "python.*--variables" 

# Verify the main.py exists at the specified path
fd -t f "main.py" /usr/share/bunkerweb/gen/

Length of output: 745


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual paths in the repository
fd -t f "main.py"

# Check for Python script argument handling in any main.py files
rg -A 5 "ArgumentParser|parse_args" $(fd -t f "main.py")

# Look for the correct path of the Python script
rg -l "gen/main.py"

Length of output: 6125


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual content of src/common/gen/main.py to see its argument handling
cat src/common/gen/main.py

# Check how this script is being called in the codebase
rg -A 2 "gen/main.py" 

Length of output: 8157

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 70f1c43 and d0aa19e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/bw/Dockerfile (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/bw/Dockerfile (1)

Pattern **/*: Be concise and precise. Skip minor issues and focus on critical problems and potentially wrong code. Avoid raising multiple comments with similar or repetitive content and instead use one comment in the selected key place to clearly state common concerns.

🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/bw/Dockerfile (2)

41-41: LGTM: DB directory copy follows project conventions

The addition of the db directory copy follows the established pattern and maintains consistent permissions with other directories.


27-28: Review the use of --break-system-packages flag

The --break-system-packages flag can lead to system instability by allowing pip to modify system-wide packages. Consider using a virtual environment or container-specific Python installation instead.

Let's check if this flag is necessary by examining the requirements files:

Consider these alternatives:

  1. Use Python's virtual environment
  2. Create a dedicated Python installation for the application
✅ Verification successful

The --break-system-packages flag is safe to use in this context

The flag is being used in a containerized environment where:

  1. Python packages are installed to isolated target directories (deps/python) using --target flag
  2. All installations use --require-hashes for security
  3. The requirements files are properly pinned with hashes
  4. This is a build-time operation in a disposable container environment

The flag is necessary to allow pip to install packages when running as root in the container build stage, but does not pose the typical system stability risks since:

  1. It's contained within the build environment
  2. Packages are installed to an isolated directory
  3. The final runtime environment is separate
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check requirements files for system packages that might require this flag
echo "Checking requirements files for system dependencies..."
for req in $(fd requirements.txt); do
  echo "=== $req ==="
  cat "$req"
done

Length of output: 93905


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the requirements files more specifically to understand if system packages are needed
echo "=== Checking src/bw/deps/requirements-gen.txt ==="
cat src/bw/deps/requirements-gen.txt || echo "File not found"

echo -e "\n=== Checking src/bw/deps/requirements-db.txt ==="
cat src/bw/deps/requirements-db.txt || echo "File not found"

# Let's also check if there are any Python system dependencies in the Dockerfile
echo -e "\n=== Checking Python related lines in Dockerfile ==="
grep -A 5 -B 5 "pip install" src/bw/Dockerfile || echo "No pip install lines found"

Length of output: 1379


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual requirements files that are being copied and used
echo "=== Checking src/common/gen/requirements.txt ==="
cat src/common/gen/requirements.txt || echo "File not found"

echo -e "\n=== Checking src/common/db/requirements.txt ==="
cat src/common/db/requirements.txt || echo "File not found"

echo -e "\n=== Checking /tmp/requirements-deps.txt ==="
cat /tmp/requirements-deps.txt || echo "File not found"

# Let's also check if there's any documentation about the Python environment
echo -e "\n=== Checking for Python environment documentation ==="
find . -type f -name "README*" -o -name "INSTALL*" | while read -r file; do
  echo "=== Checking $file ==="
  grep -i "python" "$file" || true
done

Length of output: 77060

Comment on lines +27 to +28
pip install --break-system-packages --no-cache-dir --require-hashes --target deps/python -r deps/requirements-gen.txt && \
pip install --break-system-packages --no-cache-dir --require-hashes --target deps/python -r deps/requirements-db.txt
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Requirements files with hashes not found

The Dockerfile references deps/requirements-gen.txt and deps/requirements-db.txt, but these files are not present in the repository. The --require-hashes flag is used in pip install commands, but the corresponding requirements files are missing.

  • src/bw/deps/requirements-gen.txt (missing)
  • src/bw/deps/requirements-db.txt (missing)
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify requirements file hash consistency

Since --require-hashes flag is used, ensure all requirements files contain proper hash verification.

Let's verify the hash specifications in all requirements files:

Also applies to: 22-22


Let's verify the specific requirements files mentioned in the Dockerfile:


Let's try to locate these files first since the paths might be different:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if all requirements files contain hash specifications
for req in $(fd requirements.txt); do
  echo "=== $req ==="
  if ! grep -q "sha256:" "$req"; then
    echo "WARNING: No hash specifications found in $req"
  fi
done

Length of output: 13044


Script:

#!/bin/bash
echo "=== deps/requirements-gen.txt ==="
cat src/bw/deps/requirements-gen.txt
echo -e "\n=== deps/requirements-db.txt ==="
cat src/bw/deps/requirements-db.txt

Length of output: 363


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find requirements files with -gen and -db in their names
echo "=== Looking for *requirements*gen*.txt files ==="
fd -t f "requirements.*gen.*txt"

echo -e "\n=== Looking for *requirements*db*.txt files ==="
fd -t f "requirements.*db.*txt"

# Also check the directory structure around the Dockerfile
echo -e "\n=== Directory structure around Dockerfile ==="
ls -la "$(dirname $(fd Dockerfile | grep src/bw/Dockerfile))"

Length of output: 881

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/common/helpers/readiness.sh (2)

1-5: Add error messaging and ensure proper permissions.

The PID file check should provide feedback when it fails. Also, the script should be executable.

Apply this diff to improve error handling:

 #!/bin/bash

 if [ ! -f /var/run/bunkerweb/nginx.pid ] ; then
+    echo "Error: Nginx PID file not found"
 	exit 1
 fi

1-19: Enhance script architecture with proper logging and error handling.

The script would benefit from a more robust architecture including:

  1. Consistent logging format
  2. Signal handling
  3. Unified status reporting

Consider implementing these improvements:

 #!/bin/bash
 
+set -euo pipefail
+
+# Configure logging
+log() {
+    echo "[$(date +'%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S')] $*"
+}
+
+# Handle cleanup on exit
+trap 'log "Readiness check interrupted"; exit 1' INT TERM
+
+# Initialize status
+STATUS=0
+
 if [ ! -f /var/run/bunkerweb/nginx.pid ] ; then
-	exit 1
+    log "ERROR: Nginx PID file not found"
+    STATUS=1
 fi
 
-check="$(curl -s -H "Host: healthcheck.bunkerweb.io" http://127.0.0.1:6000/healthz 2>&1)"
-# shellcheck disable=SC2181
-if [ $? -ne 0 ] || [ "$check" != "ok" ] ; then
-	exit 1
+if [ $STATUS -eq 0 ]; then
+    if ! check="$(curl -s --max-time 5 -H "Host: healthcheck.bunkerweb.io" http://127.0.0.1:6000/healthz 2>&1)" || [ "$check" != "ok" ]; then
+        log "ERROR: Health check failed: ${check}"
+        STATUS=1
+    fi
 fi
 
-# check IS_LOADING
-VAR_FILE=/etc/nginx/variables.env
-if grep -q "IS_LOADING=yes" "$VAR_FILE"; then
-    echo "pod is loading, waiting..."
-		exit 1
+if [ $STATUS -eq 0 ]; then
+    VAR_FILE=/etc/nginx/variables.env
+    if [ ! -f "$VAR_FILE" ]; then
+        log "ERROR: Variables file not found: $VAR_FILE"
+        STATUS=1
+    elif grep -q "IS_LOADING=yes" "$VAR_FILE"; then
+        log "INFO: Pod is loading, waiting..."
+        STATUS=1
+    fi
 fi
-exit 0
+
+exit $STATUS
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d0aa19e and 0673161.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/common/helpers/readiness.sh (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/common/helpers/readiness.sh (1)

Pattern **/*: Be concise and precise. Skip minor issues and focus on critical problems and potentially wrong code. Avoid raising multiple comments with similar or repetitive content and instead use one comment in the selected key place to clearly state common concerns.

Comment on lines +13 to +18
# check IS_LOADING
VAR_FILE=/etc/nginx/variables.env
if grep -q "IS_LOADING=yes" "$VAR_FILE"; then
echo "pod is loading, waiting..."
exit 1
fi
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Fix indentation and add error handling for missing file.

The code has inconsistent indentation and lacks error handling for the case when the variables file doesn't exist.

Apply this diff to fix these issues:

 # check IS_LOADING
 VAR_FILE=/etc/nginx/variables.env
+if [ ! -f "$VAR_FILE" ]; then
+    echo "Error: Variables file not found: $VAR_FILE"
+    exit 1
+fi
+
 if grep -q "IS_LOADING=yes" "$VAR_FILE"; then
     echo "pod is loading, waiting..."
-		exit 1
+    exit 1
 fi
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
# check IS_LOADING
VAR_FILE=/etc/nginx/variables.env
if grep -q "IS_LOADING=yes" "$VAR_FILE"; then
echo "pod is loading, waiting..."
exit 1
fi
# check IS_LOADING
VAR_FILE=/etc/nginx/variables.env
if [ ! -f "$VAR_FILE" ]; then
echo "Error: Variables file not found: $VAR_FILE"
exit 1
fi
if grep -q "IS_LOADING=yes" "$VAR_FILE"; then
echo "pod is loading, waiting..."
exit 1
fi

Comment on lines +7 to +11
check="$(curl -s -H "Host: healthcheck.bunkerweb.io" http://127.0.0.1:6000/healthz 2>&1)"
# shellcheck disable=SC2181
if [ $? -ne 0 ] || [ "$check" != "ok" ] ; then
exit 1
fi
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add timeout to health check and consider configurable host.

The health check could hang indefinitely without a timeout. Also, the hardcoded host header might not be suitable for all environments.

Apply this diff to add timeout and make the host configurable:

-check="$(curl -s -H "Host: healthcheck.bunkerweb.io" http://127.0.0.1:6000/healthz 2>&1)"
+HEALTH_CHECK_HOST=${HEALTH_CHECK_HOST:-"healthcheck.bunkerweb.io"}
+check="$(curl -s --max-time 5 -H "Host: ${HEALTH_CHECK_HOST}" http://127.0.0.1:6000/healthz 2>&1)"
 # shellcheck disable=SC2181
 if [ $? -ne 0 ] || [ "$check" != "ok" ] ; then
+    echo "Health check failed: ${check}"
 	exit 1
 fi
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
check="$(curl -s -H "Host: healthcheck.bunkerweb.io" http://127.0.0.1:6000/healthz 2>&1)"
# shellcheck disable=SC2181
if [ $? -ne 0 ] || [ "$check" != "ok" ] ; then
exit 1
fi
HEALTH_CHECK_HOST=${HEALTH_CHECK_HOST:-"healthcheck.bunkerweb.io"}
check="$(curl -s --max-time 5 -H "Host: ${HEALTH_CHECK_HOST}" http://127.0.0.1:6000/healthz 2>&1)"
# shellcheck disable=SC2181
if [ $? -ne 0 ] || [ "$check" != "ok" ] ; then
echo "Health check failed: ${check}"
exit 1
fi

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/common/core/reverseproxy/confs/server-http/reverse-proxy.conf (1)

Line range hint 51-151: Refactor duplicate configuration blocks.

There's significant duplication between the root and URL-specific location blocks. Consider extracting common configurations into a separate include file to improve maintainability and ensure consistency.

Create a new file proxy-common.conf:

# proxy-common.conf
proxy_set_header Host {% if REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST != "" %}"{{ REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST }}"{% else %}$host{% endif %};
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Protocol $scheme;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Host {% if REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST != "" %}"{{ REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST }}"{% else %}$http_host{% endif %};

Then include it in both location blocks:

 location / {
     etag off;
     set $backend{{ counter.value }} "{{ host }}";
     proxy_pass $backend{{ counter.value }};
+    include proxy-common.conf;
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0673161 and c82e24b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/common/core/reverseproxy/confs/server-http/reverse-proxy.conf (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/common/core/reverseproxy/confs/server-http/reverse-proxy.conf (1)

Pattern **/*: Be concise and precise. Skip minor issues and focus on critical problems and potentially wrong code. Avoid raising multiple comments with similar or repetitive content and instead use one comment in the selected key place to clearly state common concerns.

🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/common/core/reverseproxy/confs/server-http/reverse-proxy.conf (1)

54-55: Validate host variable before use.

The backend configuration lacks validation of the host variable, which could lead to undefined behavior if the host is empty or malformed.

Let's verify the host variable usage across the codebase:

Comment on lines 51 to 88
{% if USE_REVERSE_ROOT_PROXY == "yes" +%}
location / {% raw %}{{% endraw +%}
etag off;
set $backend{{ counter.value }} "{{ host }}";
proxy_pass $backend{{ counter.value }};
{% if buffering == "yes" +%}
proxy_buffering on;
{% else +%}
proxy_buffering off;
{% endif %}
{% if ws == "yes" +%}
proxy_http_version 1.1;
proxy_set_header Upgrade $http_upgrade;
proxy_set_header Connection $connection_upgrade;
{% elif keepalive == "yes" +%}
proxy_http_version 1.1;
proxy_set_header Connection "";
{% endif %}
{% if headers != "" +%}
{% for header in headers.split(";") +%}
proxy_set_header {{ header }};
{% endfor +%}
{% endif +%}
{% if headers_client != "" +%}
{% for header_client in headers_client.split(";") +%}
add_header {{ header_client }};
{% endfor +%}
{% endif +%}
proxy_connect_timeout {{ connect_timeout }};
proxy_read_timeout {{ read_timeout }};
proxy_send_timeout {{ send_timeout }};
{% if includes != "" +%}
{% for include in includes.split(" ") +%}
include {{ include }};
{% endfor +%}
{% endif +%}
{% raw %}}{% endraw %}
{% endif %}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add missing security headers and rate limiting to root proxy.

The root location block is missing several important security configurations that are present in the URL-specific block:

  1. X-Forwarded-* headers for proper client information propagation
  2. Rate limiting configuration
  3. Standard security headers

Apply these additions to align with the security standards:

 location / {
     etag off;
     set $backend{{ counter.value }} "{{ host }}";
     proxy_pass $backend{{ counter.value }};
+    proxy_set_header Host {% if REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST != "" %}"{{ REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST }}"{% else %}$host{% endif %};
+    proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
+    proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr;
+    proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme;
+    proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Protocol $scheme;
+    proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Host {% if REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST != "" %}"{{ REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST }}"{% else %}$http_host{% endif %};

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/common/core/reverseproxy/confs/server-http/reverse-proxy.conf (2)

53-105: Reduce configuration duplication using includes.

There's significant duplication between the root proxy and URL-specific proxy configurations. Consider extracting common configurations into a separate include file.

Create a new file proxy-common.conf with shared configurations and include it in both blocks:

# proxy-common.conf
proxy_set_header Host {% if REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST != "" %}"{{ REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST }}"{% else %}$host{% endif %};
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
# ... other common settings ...

# Then in the main config:
location / {
    include proxy-common.conf;
    # root-specific settings
}

location {{ url }} {
    include proxy-common.conf;
    # URL-specific settings
}

Also applies to: 109-169


107-108: Improve counter variable handling.

The counter increment is inside the conditional block, which could lead to gaps in backend numbering if conditions aren't met. Consider moving it outside the conditional.

-		{% endif %}
-		{% set counter.value = counter.value + 1 %}
+		{% endif %}
+	{% set counter.value = counter.value + 1 %}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c82e24b and 52f3ce3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/common/core/reverseproxy/confs/server-http/reverse-proxy.conf (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/common/core/reverseproxy/confs/server-http/reverse-proxy.conf (1)

Pattern **/*: Be concise and precise. Skip minor issues and focus on critical problems and potentially wrong code. Avoid raising multiple comments with similar or repetitive content and instead use one comment in the selected key place to clearly state common concerns.

🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/common/core/reverseproxy/confs/server-http/reverse-proxy.conf (3)

57-62: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add security headers for root proxy configuration.

While basic forwarding headers are set, consider adding security headers such as:

  • X-Content-Type-Options
  • X-XSS-Protection
  • X-Frame-Options
 proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Protocol $scheme;
 proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Host {% if REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST != "" %}"{{ REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST }}"{% else %}$http_host{% endif %};
+add_header X-Content-Type-Options "nosniff" always;
+add_header X-XSS-Protection "1; mode=block" always;
+add_header X-Frame-Options "SAMEORIGIN" always;

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


Line range hint 52-170: Verify rate limiting and access controls.

Ensure that appropriate rate limiting and access controls are configured for the root proxy, either in this file or in included configurations.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the output, I can see that rate limiting is properly configured in the codebase:

  1. There are both connection limiting (limit_conn) and request rate limiting (limit_req) modules configured
  2. The configuration files show proper rate limiting zones and settings in src/common/core/limit/confs/http/limitconn.conf
  3. The implementation includes proper request tracking, connection tracking and enforcement mechanisms

Let me verify the access controls with another script to check the specific configuration:


Rate limiting and access controls are properly configured.

The verification shows comprehensive security measures are in place:

  1. Rate limiting is properly configured with:

    • Connection limiting zones (limit_conn_zone) for both HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 clients
    • Proper status code (429) for rate limiting responses
    • Warning-level logging for rate limit violations
  2. Access controls are implemented through:

    • Support for external authentication via auth_request directives
    • Configurable sign-in URL redirects for 401 responses
    • Ability to set custom auth variables from the authentication provider

The root proxy configuration includes these security features and they are properly integrated with the rate limiting and access control modules.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for rate limiting configurations
echo "Checking for rate limiting configurations..."
rg -l "limit_req_zone|limit_conn_zone" | xargs rg -A 5 "limit_req|limit_conn"

# Check for access control configurations
echo "Checking for access control configurations..."
rg -l "allow|deny" | xargs rg -A 5 "allow|deny"

Length of output: 65819


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the specific rate limiting and access control configurations
echo "Checking rate limiting configuration details..."
cat src/common/core/limit/confs/http/limitconn.conf

echo -e "\nChecking for auth_request configurations..."
rg -l "auth_request" | xargs rg "auth_request"

Length of output: 21270


52-56: Consider adding request validation for root proxy.

The root proxy configuration (location /) could potentially expose sensitive endpoints. Consider adding request validation or filtering mechanisms before proxying requests to the backend.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 32584cf and 6243f1b.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/common/core/reverseproxy/confs/server-http/reverse-proxy.conf (2 hunks)
  • src/common/core/ui/confs/default-server-http/ui.conf (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/common/core/ui/confs/default-server-http/ui.conf
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/common/core/reverseproxy/confs/server-http/reverse-proxy.conf (1)

Pattern **/*: Be concise and precise. Skip minor issues and focus on critical problems and potentially wrong code. Avoid raising multiple comments with similar or repetitive content and instead use one comment in the selected key place to clearly state common concerns.

🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/common/core/reverseproxy/confs/server-http/reverse-proxy.conf (1)

Line range hint 51-162: Consider adding security headers and rate limiting.

The configuration is missing several important security measures that were mentioned in previous reviews:

  1. Standard security headers (X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, etc.)
  2. Rate limiting configuration
  3. Request size limits

These measures are essential for protecting the upstream services from abuse and ensuring secure communication.

Comment on lines 51 to 104
{% if USE_REVERSE_ROOT_PROXY == "yes" +%}
location / {% raw %}{{% endraw +%}
etag off;
set $backend{{ counter.value }} "{{ host }}";
proxy_pass $backend{{ counter.value }};
proxy_set_header Host {% if REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST != "" %}"{{ REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST }}"{% else %}$host{% endif %};
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Protocol $scheme;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Host {% if REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST != "" %}"{{ REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST }}"{% else %}$http_host{% endif %};
{% if buffering == "yes" +%}
proxy_buffering on;
{% else +%}
proxy_buffering off;
{% endif %}
{% if ws == "yes" +%}
proxy_http_version 1.1;
proxy_set_header Upgrade $http_upgrade;
proxy_set_header Connection $connection_upgrade;
{% elif keepalive == "yes" +%}
proxy_http_version 1.1;
proxy_set_header Connection "";
{% endif %}
{% if auth_request != "" +%}
auth_request {{ auth_request }};
{% endif +%}
{% if auth_request_signin_url != "" +%}
error_page 401 =302 {{ auth_request_signin_url }};
{% endif +%}
{% if auth_request_sets != "" +%}
{% for auth_request_set in auth_request_sets.split(";") +%}
auth_request_set {{ auth_request_set }};
{% endfor +%}
{% endif +%}
{% if headers != "" +%}
{% for header in headers.split(";") +%}
proxy_set_header {{ header }};
{% endfor +%}
{% endif +%}
{% if headers_client != "" +%}
{% for header_client in headers_client.split(";") +%}
add_header {{ header_client }};
{% endfor +%}
{% endif +%}
proxy_connect_timeout {{ connect_timeout }};
proxy_read_timeout {{ read_timeout }};
proxy_send_timeout {{ send_timeout }};
{% if includes != "" +%}
{% for include in includes.split(" ") +%}
include {{ include }};
{% endfor +%}
{% endif +%}
{% raw %}}{% endraw %}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Reduce code duplication by extracting common proxy configuration.

The root proxy block duplicates most of its configuration from the URL-specific block. This makes maintenance harder and increases the risk of inconsistencies.

Consider extracting the common configuration into a separate include file:

  1. Create a new file proxy-common.conf:
etag off;
proxy_pass $backend{{ counter.value }};
proxy_set_header Host {% if REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST != "" %}"{{ REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST }}"{% else %}$host{% endif %};
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Protocol $scheme;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Host {% if REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST != "" %}"{{ REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST }}"{% else %}$http_host{% endif %};

# ... rest of the common configuration ...
  1. Update both location blocks to include this file:
 location / {
     set $backend{{ counter.value }} "{{ host }}";
-    # ... all the duplicated configuration ...
+    include proxy-common.conf;
 }

Comment on lines 55 to 61
proxy_pass $backend{{ counter.value }};
proxy_set_header Host {% if REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST != "" %}"{{ REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST }}"{% else %}$host{% endif %};
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Protocol $scheme;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Host {% if REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST != "" %}"{{ REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST }}"{% else %}$http_host{% endif %};
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add X-Forwarded-Prefix header for root location.

The root location block is missing the X-Forwarded-Prefix header that's present in the URL-specific block. Some applications rely on this header to determine their base path.

Add the missing header:

 proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme;
 proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Protocol $scheme;
 proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Host {% if REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST != "" %}"{{ REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST }}"{% else %}$http_host{% endif %};
+proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Prefix "/";
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
proxy_pass $backend{{ counter.value }};
proxy_set_header Host {% if REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST != "" %}"{{ REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST }}"{% else %}$host{% endif %};
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Protocol $scheme;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Host {% if REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST != "" %}"{{ REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST }}"{% else %}$http_host{% endif %};
proxy_pass $backend{{ counter.value }};
proxy_set_header Host {% if REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST != "" %}"{{ REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST }}"{% else %}$host{% endif %};
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Protocol $scheme;
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Host {% if REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST != "" %}"{{ REVERSE_PROXY_CUSTOM_HOST }}"{% else %}$http_host{% endif %};
proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Prefix "/";

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/common/db/model.py (1)

130-133: Verify cascading foreign key relationship changes

The service_id field length has been consistently updated across all related tables (Services_settings, Jobs_cache, Custom_configs). While the foreign key relationships are properly maintained, this change requires coordinated migration.

Consider the following recommendations:

  1. Ensure a migration script handles all affected tables atomically
  2. Consider adding database constraints to validate service ID format/length
  3. Add validation at the application level for service ID length

Also applies to: 175-175, 190-190

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e53eacb and 5ed7200.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/common/db/model.py (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/common/db/model.py (1)

Pattern **/*: Be concise and precise. Skip minor issues and focus on critical problems and potentially wrong code. Avoid raising multiple comments with similar or repetitive content and instead use one comment in the selected key place to clearly state common concerns.

🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/common/db/model.py (1)

118-118: ⚠️ Potential issue

Breaking change: Service ID length increased

The change from String(64) to String(256) for the primary key is a breaking change that requires careful migration handling. This modification affects database schema and existing data.

Let's verify the impact on existing data:

@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ class Global_values(Base):
class Services(Base):
__tablename__ = "bw_services"

id = Column(String(64), primary_key=True)
id = Column(String(256), primary_key=True)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Database migration strategy needed

This schema change requires a clear migration strategy to:

  1. Handle existing data
  2. Maintain data integrity during migration
  3. Ensure backward compatibility if needed

Would you like me to help create:

  1. A database migration script?
  2. Data validation utilities?
  3. Rollback procedures?

Also applies to: 130-133, 175-175, 190-190

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/common/confs/healthcheck.conf (1)

18-22: LGTM! Consider adding documentation about available metrics.

The new /nginx_status endpoint is properly secured and follows Nginx best practices. The localhost-only access and explicit deny rule provide good security boundaries.

Consider adding a comment to document the metrics provided by stub_status, such as:

 location /nginx_status {
+        # Provides: Active connections, accepted connections, handled connections
+        # Total requests, Reading/Writing/Waiting connections
         stub_status on;
         allow 127.0.0.1;
         deny all;
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c1b8f31 and a7c5846.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/common/confs/healthcheck.conf (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/common/confs/healthcheck.conf (1)

Pattern **/*: Be concise and precise. Skip minor issues and focus on critical problems and potentially wrong code. Avoid raising multiple comments with similar or repetitive content and instead use one comment in the selected key place to clearly state common concerns.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a7c5846 and 7b8fcc1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/common/confs/server-http/server.conf (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/common/confs/server-http/server.conf (1)

Pattern **/*: Be concise and precise. Skip minor issues and focus on critical problems and potentially wrong code. Avoid raising multiple comments with similar or repetitive content and instead use one comment in the selected key place to clearly state common concerns.

Comment on lines 30 to 34
include car-service-stage-firewall.ing.getjerry.com/set-lua.conf;
include car-service-stage-firewall.ing.getjerry.com/ssl-certificate-lua.conf;
include car-service-stage-firewall.ing.getjerry.com/access-lua.conf;
include car-service-stage-firewall.ing.getjerry.com/header-lua.conf;
include car-service-stage-firewall.ing.getjerry.com/log-lua.conf;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Based on the evidence gathered, I can now provide the final response:

Hardcoded domain prefix should use NGINX_PREFIX variable for environment portability

The server configuration uses hardcoded paths car-service-stage-firewall.ing.getjerry.com/ for Lua includes, while other includes in the same file and related configurations use the {{ NGINX_PREFIX }} variable. This inconsistency breaks the established pattern for environment-specific configurations.

  • Replace hardcoded includes with parameterized versions:
include {{ NGINX_PREFIX }}set-lua.conf;
include {{ NGINX_PREFIX }}ssl-certificate-lua.conf;
include {{ NGINX_PREFIX }}access-lua.conf;
include {{ NGINX_PREFIX }}header-lua.conf;
include {{ NGINX_PREFIX }}log-lua.conf;
🔗 Analysis chain

Hardcoded domain references may hamper environment portability.

These includes now reference “car-service-stage-firewall.ing.getjerry.com” instead of a parameterized prefix. While this change may be valid for a staging environment, it can break portability for other environments. Consider using a variable or an environment-driven approach to maintain flexibility across different environments.


Let me check the content of these files to see if they contain any environment-specific configurations or if they use variables for domain references.


Let me check if there are any environment variables or configuration patterns used elsewhere in the repository that might indicate the intended approach for handling domain references.


Let me check if there are any environment-specific configurations or templates that show how these includes should be handled.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the referenced .conf files exist in the codebase.
# This helps ensure the includes point to valid files.
for confFile in set-lua.conf ssl-certificate-lua.conf access-lua.conf header-lua.conf log-lua.conf; do
  echo "------------------------------"
  echo " Checking for $confFile..."
  fd -c never -t f "$confFile"
done

Length of output: 1636


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the .conf files to see if they use variables or contain hardcoded domains
for conf in src/common/confs/server-http/*.conf; do
  echo "=== Content of $conf ==="
  cat "$conf"
  echo -e "\n\n"
done

Length of output: 18929


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for environment variable usage and domain configuration patterns
echo "=== Searching for NGINX_PREFIX usage ==="
rg "NGINX_PREFIX" -A 2 -B 2

echo -e "\n=== Searching for similar include patterns ==="
rg "include.*\.ing\.getjerry\.com" -A 2 -B 2

echo -e "\n=== Checking for environment configuration files ==="
fd -e env -e yaml -e yml -e conf -e template

Length of output: 28320


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for environment variable usage in server.conf and related templates
echo "=== Checking server.conf template patterns ==="
rg -A 2 -B 2 "include.*\{\{.*\}\}" src/common/confs/server-http/

echo -e "\n=== Checking for other similar include patterns ==="
rg -A 2 -B 2 "include.*lua\.conf" src/common/confs/

Length of output: 2930

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant